by entkayjay » Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:39 am
Well, I just don't nominate myself, that's just me. Fine with someone else doing it, there's nothing wrong with it. I'm proud of all my stuff (whether justified or not), so it would be like picking between my kids. Especially lately, I agonize over everything I do, and I don't post it if I'm not proud of it, so... I hereby nominate everything I've written. XD
In no way, shape, or form were my comments meant as any kind of commentary or critique of anyone. My apologies if anyone took it that way. I was simply pondering that many A/R focused stories don't get the airplay, readership, recs or reviews that a gen story or canon pairing story does, anywhere really, because there seem to be fewer people who seek it out. *shrugs* I have my own reading preferences, and my time is limited, so there are many stories in the archive that I haven't read but would enjoy, and seeing a little blurb promoting them from someone who is enthusiastic about it would go a long way toward piquing my interest and putting it on my to-read list. That's the idea here.
And my concern regarding the "story" part of the "Best A/R Story" is that a B-pairing -- well-written, wonderful, and squee-worthy and all that -- isn't necessarily a "story" to me. Parts of fiction: conflict, climax, resolution. Story involves someone evolving, something happening to change someone between the beginning and the end. If a pairing is there to move the main story along, then it's not about them, it's about the main story. If a pairing is there as window dressing, it's not about them. If the main thrust of the story is gen, and there's some slash worked in along the way, it's not about them. It contains them, but if they don't change in some way, if there's no movement... it's not, imho, an A/R story. Or a R/S story. Or a TnT story. Doesn't matter the pairing, it would make me uncomfortable if anything I wrote -- which is not going to have a TnT focus because they are just not my strong suite -- was considered a TnT story and nominated alongside someone else's that clearly was.
That's what I think differentiates fandom Gen writing from Shipper/Slasher writing. In Gen writing, the characters move the story along. In shipper/slash (and even some friendship) writing, the story moves the relationship along in some direction. Of course there are exceptions to every "rule" (termed loosely), and characters/relationships evolve in gen stories just as ships/slash can be completely plotty.
If there was a B-plot alongside an A-plot that moved along, I think that works as a defined story (like in an episode).
And drabbles are their own element. Some are complete stories in 100 words. Others are windows into someone's world. I'd assume that's why they have their own category and aren't completely lumped in with the generic "story".
I'd like to suggest including something like B-pairing or some such in the nominations, because yes, the writing has been great. In that way there could be an even clearer acknowledgment of someone's work, because an outstanding "cameo" with rich characterization and good lines can get lost just as easily among a sea of other stories. Win-win, imho.
ETA: I knew there was a better phrase I was looking for but I was running on empty last night. Rather than "B pairing" how about a "Guest Star Pairing"? It's not less-than, it's just not the main event. Kind of like the Emmy's... "Best Actor" nominations go to the main stars, "Best Supporting Actor" goes to the supporting stars, surprise surprise. And one-offs are in the Guest category. Just a thought.