by Honeybee » Mon Sep 27, 2010 2:37 pm
Right. Why bother? I suppose it boils down to whether you think they are the same or different. Ideally, Phlox would have saved them both. Again, if you think people are nothing but genetic material and memories, then Trip and Sim are the same person - with Sim simply having additional memories on top. If you believe in something more, say a soul, then they must be different.
Sim floats the possibility of Phlox researching a way to stop his rapid aging - his lifespan is two weeks - and he argues that his life should be just as valued as Trip's. Phlox says the research, some kind of enzyme that could stop Sim's aging, isn't prove and by the time he had created the enzyme the window for saving Trip would have passed. The fact that Sim argues in favor of his own life indicates he sees himself as more than spare parts, that he's the living conscious entity that T'Pol said he would be.
But in the end, Archer is unwilling to take the risk. I think he makes it pretty clear he'll order Sim's death to save Trip, and lucky for him Sim chooses death instead. But Sim does it not for Archer, but for Trip and Lizzie and the mission. That's what Trip would have done.
But, if it had been equally plausible to save Sim instead of Trip, it would have made Phlox and Archer both face up to the question of which one of these entities is Trip and moreover, which one of them has the right to live?