I've read some things that looked promising, but were awful in the way they handle something or were written. By contrast I've read things I don't normally read and marveled at how well the story was written and how much I enjoyed it. Which leads me to this question, what makes a good story?
For me a good story depends on these factors:
1) Is the spelling and grammar correct?
I can't get into a story with constant mistakes that could be easily corrected the majority of the time. It's distracting to read something and HAVE to edit in your head to read it.
2) Was I able to suspend disbelief while reading the story?
If a story doesn't seem possible in the universe the story is set I'm not going to think of it as a good story though it may be enjoyable to read. To do so I would have to imagine it as an AU of some sort, where the circumstances presented are plausible.
3) Is the plot clear but not obvious?
This is one of the more difficult to explain of mental criteria for me when enjoying a story. As the reader I want to be able to see where the writer is going but not have everything given away. A story summery should give me the basics to follow the plot and a good story builds upon it so that the stories intentions are clear but don't bash me on the head. Leaving the real development of plot to character insights. Essentially, Trip is doing something crazy? Can I see why he's doing it and if it makes sense to the summery the author gave? I don't want the story given away and do enjoy twists, I just prefer the story fits what the author presents.
As a writer I try to give my readers a clear picture of the plot without giving away any plot twists I may have in reserves. It's important for me that my readers understand the plot and why things happen but don't feel I've told instead of shown the story. I want them to be able to follow my logic and if surprised by something, feel it makes sense.
4) Do I feel for the characters? Proper characterization.
Do I sympathize with the characters when I'm reading or feel like they should jump off a bridge? Can understand both the villain and hero, all the while rooting for the good guy to win? Does Trip or another character close to tears make me sad? All these are questions I ask myself when judging a story and whether I answer yes or no determines if a story meet this rule of mine.
All those questions mean nothing without proper characterization. Something I look for even in parodies that may be oc in regards to canon. Even when it's not something the character would normally say, does it still fit them in some fundamental way. I'm reading a parody in which one of the orcs in "The Hobbit" has a crush on the elf Taulriel. Legolas encourages him by whipping out a phone and showing a video of Tauriel chasing an orc around trying to kiss it. While he wouldn't do that in canon it still seems like something a kind but snarky elf prince would do.
5) Am I able to immerse myself in the story while reading it?
This follows closely my need to be able to suspend disbelief while reading. But not all stories that suspend disbelief are able to get me immersed. It takes a combination of the first four to do this.
6) When done reading do I want to read it again, or wish there was another chapter to read, another part if its a series?
I think this explains itself.
Is it OCD of me to of typed this up in a word document once I decided to add the last four? It just appeared to be the most logical way to do it, and to make sure everything was spelled the way I want it. What do you feel makes a good story?