by Honeybee » Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:06 am
What I love about the episode, is that it didn't gloss over Voyager's flaws, but it wasn't reductive. It's so easy just to take potshots at writing shortcuts like their never-ending supply of shuttles or Seven of Nine's over-the-top outfits. This article moved beyond that to look at what the show did right and why it might make certain people uncomfortable.
It's interesting, I knew a guy who grew up Catholic in Northern Ireland and while he was very masculine, Voyager was hands down his favorite show. I always thought it was because of the Maquis, but this article makes me think it was deeper than that. Voyager empathized with victims of injustice and war and violence, it didn't just frame it in context of the all-powerful rescuer. But it wasn't cynical, either. I remember during the Penn State scandal, a male sports writer was on a podcast talking about how organizations with at least some women in power are far less likely to tolerate sexual abuse (it's not absolute, but it's definitely true to a point). The reason he gave was that women tend to empathize with victims, where men trying to climb a patriarchal ladder tend to empathize with the people in power and subconsciously fear speaking out for victims will make you look weak, despite how counter intuitive that is. I thought of that when I read this article, and when you think about it, Voyager being de-coupled with the mass power that was the Federation, make it very vulnerable will still trying to cling to ideals that are easier to conform to when you have that kind of power behind you. On top of that, the crew (male and female) tended to empathize (not just want to rescue) small, marginalized communities that they met along the way.
Seven did turn out to be a fascinating character, and I'm going to rewatch some of the episodes in context with this author's assertion of her as a Hitchcock-type blond, victim. I'm totally going to start with The Raven.